🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from Spotify and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Development

Observers said the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for data to develop their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. The company, which carries more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a external actor collected public metadata and employed illicit tactics to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced material is sadly widespread in the AI industry, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

In the UK, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, research and technology informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.